Open Mobile Alliance
Interoperability Satisfaction Survey

 

Please complete the following questions to help the OMA Board Interoperability sub-commitee understand progress made in fulfilling the Interoperability objectives, as well as help the group plan for improvements going forward.
 
Required fields are marked in Bold.
 

 
General Questions:
 

  Member Category
  Member Class
  I participate in BOD-IOP:
Yes   No  
  I participate in IOP-WG:
Yes   No  
  My company has participated
    in one or more TestFests:
Yes   No  

 
  What is your Name?
    (Optional)

  If we may contact you regarding your comments, please provide either of:

  your email address
    (Optional)
  or, your phone number
    (Optional)
(+ ) -
   country-code     area-code        number

 

 
Evaluation of the Interoperability Process:
 

  With regard to the Interoperability Process as currently defined, please can you answer the following questions
 

  On the Effectiveness and Efficiency
    of the IOP Process, are you:
Very Satisfied   Satisfied   Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied Dissatisfied   Very Dissatisfied Not Applicable  No Comment 
  On the Quality of the Test
    Specifications, are you:
Very Satisfied   Satisfied   Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied Dissatisfied   Very Dissatisfied Not Applicable  No Comment 
  On the Timeliness of the IOP
    Specifications, are you:
Very Satisfied   Satisfied   Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied Dissatisfied   Very Dissatisfied Not Applicable  No Comment 
  On the Effectiveness of the
    IOP Working Group, are you:
Very Satisfied   Satisfied   Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied Dissatisfied   Very Dissatisfied Not Applicable  No Comment 
  On the Support by the OMA Board
    for Interoperability, are you:
Very Satisfied   Satisfied   Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied Dissatisfied   Very Dissatisfied Not Applicable  No Comment 
  On the adaptability of the
    Interoperability Program to change, are you:
Very Satisfied   Satisfied   Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied Dissatisfied   Very Dissatisfied Not Applicable  No Comment 
  Do you have any General Comments
    on the Interoperability Process?

 

 
TestFests in General:
 

  With regard to the TestFests as currently operated, please can you how satisfied you are with the following statements,
     even if your company has not participated in any of the TestFests.

 

  The TestFests offer
    "good value for moeny":
Very Satisfied   Satisfied   Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied Dissatisfied   Very Dissatisfied Not Applicable  No Comment 
  The TestFests have protected
    my company's confidential information:
Very Satisfied   Satisfied   Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied Dissatisfied   Very Dissatisfied Not Applicable  No Comment 
  The TestFests have provided
    sufficient Enabler coverage:
Very Satisfied   Satisfied   Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied Dissatisfied   Very Dissatisfied Not Applicable  No Comment 
  The Test Specification offer
    good coverage of each Enabler,
     eg. air interfaces:
Very Satisfied   Satisfied   Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied Dissatisfied   Very Dissatisfied Not Applicable  No Comment 
  The TestFests have been well
    organized and implemented:
Very Satisfied   Satisfied   Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied Dissatisfied   Very Dissatisfied Not Applicable  No Comment 
  The number of TestFests per year
    should be:
Increased
to 9 or 10
Increased
to 7 or 8
Stay the same
at 5 or 6
Decreased
to 3 or 4
Decreased
to 1 or 2
Not Applicable  No Comment 
  Do you have any General Comments
    on the TestFests?

 

 
TestFests in Detail:
 

  Please can you answer the following specific questions about the organization and your participation in the TestFests.

 

  When do you think your company
    will participate in a Test Fest:
Already Participating 0 to 3
Months
3 to 6
Months
6 to 12
Months
More than 12
Months
Never No Comment 
  Is the provision of GSM/GPRS
    Essential for your company
    to participate in a TestFest:
Essential Important Nice to Have Not Needed Don't Know No Comment 
  Is the provision of CDMA/W-CDMA
    Essential for your company
    to participate in a TestFest:
Essential Important Nice to Have Not Needed Don't Know No Comment 
  Would it increase your participation
    in TestFests if Client teams could test
    more than one Enabler:
 
Increase Stay the Same Decrease Don't Know No Comment   
  Do you think the testing at
    TestFests should be more or less formal:
 
More Formal Stay the Same Less Formal Don't Know No Comment   
  What do you see as the optimum time
    between test sessions for an Enabler
    at a TestFest:
1 to 2
Months
3 to 4
Months
5 to 6
Months
More than 6
Months
Don't Know No Comment 
  Which new Enablers should
    OMA start offering at TestFests in 2004?
  What should OMA do to
    improve the TestFests?

 

 
OMA Communication Process:
 

  Please can you indicate how satisfied you are with the communications, you have received regarding the Interoperability Process and its implementation.

 

  Visibility of the overall
    Interoperability Process:
Very Satisfied   Satisfied   Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied Dissatisfied   Very Dissatisfied Not Applicable  No Comment 
  Openness of the Test Results:
Very Satisfied   Satisfied   Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied Dissatisfied   Very Dissatisfied Not Applicable  No Comment 
  Publication of the IOP Enabler
    Poll Results:
Very Satisfied   Satisfied   Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied Dissatisfied   Very Dissatisfied Not Applicable  No Comment 
  OMA's public messages on
    Interoperability:
Very Satisfied   Satisfied   Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied Dissatisfied   Very Dissatisfied Not Applicable  No Comment 
  OMA's relationships to other
    Bodies/Fora:
Very Satisfied   Satisfied   Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied Dissatisfied   Very Dissatisfied Not Applicable  No Comment 
  Do you have any General Comments
    on Interoperability Communications?

 

 
Interoperability Promise Achievements:
 

  With regard to the Interoperability Promise as currently defined, please can you answer the following general questions
 

  On Overall Progress, are you:
Very Satisfied   Satisfied   Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied Dissatisfied   Very Dissatisfied Not Applicable  No Comment 
  Do you have any General Comments
    on Progress?
  What has OMA done well?
  What could OMA do better?

 

Thank you for your time to complete this survey. Your individual responses will be held in confidence and reviewed by the OMA Board Interoperability sub-committee only. Summary results will be made available to all members.